What happens when your face can be cloned online—who pays?

What if a single image could ruin your life because AI can clone you online? Denmark’s proposed copyright bill would copyright your face and require platforms to remove deepfakes that imitate your appearance or voice without consent. The push follows Marie Watson, a Danish streamer who found a nude deepfake of herself—altered from a holiday snap she had posted on Instagram—an experience that underscores how personal identity is at risk in a digital age of generative AI.

The technology behind deepfakes has grown dramatically, with tools from major players like OpenAI and Google enabling more realistic images, videos, and audio to be produced with ease. The stakes are high: misrepresented images can disrupt elections, smear individuals, or humiliate everyday people.

In response, Denmark is moving to change copyright law to empower individuals to demand takedowns and claim oversight over their likeness. If enacted, offenders could face platform-level consequences rather than punishment for private users uploading content themselves. The bill would strike a balance by allowing parodies and satire, though the lines are not yet crystal clear. Danish Culture Minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt framed the bill as essential to protect reality and democracy, stating that deepfakes can undermine public trust if not curbed, especially when political figures can be misrepresented without recourse. Henry Ajder, a leading AI policy expert, welcomes the move, noting that current options for protecting identity are insufficient and that the law must evolve to safeguard dignity in the digital sphere. He stressed the need for scalable enforcement as the deepfake landscape expands.

The Danish initiative has drawn interest from other EU members—France and Ireland among them—as Europe considers how to regulate synthetic media while preserving creativity. EU leaders acknowledge the urgency given misinformation and digital manipulation’s potential to destabilize democratic processes. Beyond Denmark, the broader regulatory environment includes US efforts to criminalize publishing intimate deepfakes without consent, and Korea’s stricter penalties for deepfake pornography.

Meanwhile, a separate discussion about France Identité—the optional digital ID app—has been misrepresented online as a plan to link identities to social media accounts. In reality, France’s system does not tie IDs to social accounts, and the final law does not enforce such linkage; it does permit age verification and aims to increase privacy and user control, not erode it. As policy makers weigh protective measures, critics argue that we must avoid stifling expression or innovation while defending individuals from and manipulation. The central takeaway is clear: your digital likeness is becoming a legal fixture—how that power is exercised will shape privacy, accountability, and democracy across Europe.

Read more

Local News